Secondary Navigation

Search

go

Banner Ad

advertisement

published: Sunday, December 14, 2008

Bookmark and Share

Funeral home seeks variance to bury abandoned remains

By CHRISTOPHER TUFFLEY

christopher.tuffley@newssun.com

SEBRING -- Tuesday night at the regular city council meeting, the Stephenson-Nelson Funeral Home and Crematory will ask for a variance from the city's cemetery ordinance. Currently only two sets of remains may be placed in any one vault.

A vault is a weatherproof barrier buried in the ground.

The variance requested is a limited, special-needs situation. The funeral home has been storing on its premises about 44 sets of cremated remains that have never been claimed by the families.

"It blows our minds (that remains would be abandoned), but there are a variety of reasons and if everyone was the same it would be a boring world," said Darin MacNeill, funeral director.

In fact, he pointed out that the law allows funeral homes to dispose of unclaimed remains however they see fit. "But we just can't do that," MacNeill said. "It's an ethical issue with us."

Instead, because the business owns a plot in the Pinecrest Cemetery and has a vault available, the funeral home wants permission to intern all the remains -- which are in separate containers -- in that one place.

"Being in the vault in the cemetery not only protects them," MacNeill said, "but also gives them a dignified place of rest. If a family member ever wanted to recover them it would be possible."

Both the funeral home and the city will have a list of whose remains are in the vault and the funeral home would pay the city for the marking of the grave to remove the cremains if that became necessary.

If the council decides to amend its cemetery ordinance to allow this, the amendment will have to make clear it pertains only to licensed funeral homes and cremains which have basically been abandoned.




Belinda  (by: Just another opinion  -   12/16/2008)

I think you missed the point of MT Graves comments. The story indicated that the family of the loved ones abandoned them. I can't speak for MT but I think he or she was trying to point out that families obiviously didn't have much love for their departed family members. I think they have already been "dumped" by their familes. Maybe we should be writing to shame them into comming forward to claim the remains of their "loved one".

MT GRAVES  (by: Belinda  -   12/15/2008)

what is wrong with you?? Have you never lost a loved one?? How would you feel if one of those was one of your family members and someone else said, " oh, just dump them" ?? people like you should NOT be allowed to speak or type!! it just shows your ignorance.

...  (by: B.M.D.  -   12/15/2008)

theres alot wrong with that way of going about it, and also thats quite sarcastic and rude.

Mmmmm..  (by: M.T. Graves  -   12/14/2008)

What's wrong with Lake Jackson? That way, should the families ever show up to claim their "loved ones" it wouldn't cost anyone anything! Easy access and a nice day at the beach...what more could anyone ask?


captcha 6f4deb7a3c704234ab037c29c8505049

Small Banner Ads

Search powered by: MIDFLORIDA

Featured Auto

Featured Home

Marketplace Ads

Tile Ads

HarborPoint Network: The Daily CommercialThe South Lake PressNews-SunWashington Jewish Week

All Contents Copyright 2008, HarborPoint Media and The News Sun.
2227 US 27 - Sebring, FL - 33870 -- 863-385-6155

Please read our Privacy StatementContact Us